And here we are again with another Microfiction Monday. Or is it just another Microfiction Monday? I daresay not.
I saw the picture yesterday, instantly had an idea for the story, and then didn’t write it because it was controversial. It would be taken wrong. I would be pilloried for having written it. Why risk losing what few readers I have? Surely not the best course of action.
These thoughts gave way to guilt. If I don’t write it, I’m not being true to my own voice. I’m letting people scare me off. How can I possibly be afraid if I have enough confidence in my own writing? And that’s where I stumbled upon the truth. I thought about not having the confidence I’d like in my own writing. But that didn’t make much sense. I truly believe in my writing. I know where it’s weak and where it’s strong. I can pull chapters out of Gospel of Lazlo and say “I hate this, but it was necessary” or “I didn’t have the skill to write this portion in the way I wanted.” I can be honest with myself about that. So what was it?
Inevitably, the truth came into focus. I didn’t have confidence in my audience. I lacked faith in you, the reader. I dismissed those kind enough to spend their moments reading my writing as small-minded, temperamental lynch mob elements. This is a disservice, of course. And I apologize. And so I fall back to my process used in writing my book: Pretend no one else is ever going to read it. Not my mom, my uncles, or my dear old grandma.
And so, with this picture:

You get this story:
He cringed when I brought an Oriental home. Openly scowled at finding a Negro in my room. I was giddy to see poor daddy’s reaction to Bobo.
Why did this come to mind? Students of writing are, as Tom Spanbauer insists, students of life. Along those same lines, Natalie Goldberg alleges that writers live their lives twice. They experience things once as it happens and again as they deconstruct the experience in their mind. It was during the later deconstruction with a female friend who dates exclusively outside her race that I began to suspect she dated these men in order to needle her father. This wasn’t a conclusion arrived at lightly. I hold this friend near and dear to me and would not confront her with it, but I did test the subject a bit, taking careful note of how she developed her conversation when the subject came up.
With a 100% occurance rate, daddy disapproving of her dating choices based on race would arise. Accompanying each conversation were litanies of her father’s faults. In fact, sometimes her father’s faults would kick off a conversation leading to her dating habits.
Being writerly – further deconstruction ensued. For example, was it fair to those being dated to be chosen on her criteria? I wondered if the seeminly race-blind act of dating interracially could actually be more bigoted than dating normally. Isn’t the person dating based solely on race making assumptions they expect to be met just because of your skin color? Lots and lots of questions came up when I really got into it.
And then the character was born. Poor little rich girl wanting daddy’s attention so badly. She’s surely a bigot but will date anything she can find in order to get even a disapproving scowl. Pay careful attention to her language. She uses words generally considered unacceptable and feels not only joy over her father’s discomfort, but looks forward to seeing more! What at first seems to be all about race to the reader is all about daddy to the narrator while, in reality, is all about the girl in question.
While this post has taken quite a long time to type up, the actual process of deciding what story went with that picture took seconds. The background work took more, but it’s not like this will be the only usable thought to arise from it.
I’ve probably taken enough of your time now. Hope I gave you something to think about. And I hope you write bravely so I have something to chew on when I visit.